There are no words to describe what abortionist Gosnell did. I won’t try to come up with any. What he did in his little shop of horrors is no different than what goes on every day in abortion clinics across this country. Gosnell is guilty of murder. So is Planned Parenthood.
Abortion is the greatest child abuse. But it is also abuse of women. Abortion ends the life of a child God calls by name, but it forever changes the mother of that child. Babies carried into an abortion chamber by their mothers never exit. Mothers may exit, but they are physically, psychologically and spiritually altered. The way they see themselves and life itself is never the same.
What happens in abortion clinics will continue to happen until we all begin to see ourselves the way God sees us. Women will continue to seek abortions, men will pay for them, and churches will defend them until we stop identifying ourselves the wrong way.
Never – ever, has God identified boys and girls as “sexual from birth.” Before Alfred Kinsey, no one ever labeled children in such a way. But, for the last 60+ years, children have been told beginning as early as kindergarten that they are “sexual from birth.” Can we be so surprised that abortion was legalized some twenty years after men and women took on this new identity? If we’re told from childhood that we are “sexual,” then it can’t be helped. It is, after all, who God made us to be. Abstain? It would go against nature, wouldn’t it, to abstain from what is natural.
There is this one thing. Behavior is shaped by identity. However we see ourselves and others determines how we treat ourselves and others. Gosnell looked at the women and children who entered his clinic as less than human. He saw the women as sexual beings and the babies were products of that sexuality. Gosnell failed to see them all as God sees them. When we mis-identify our children as “sexual from birth” (which is taught in every sex education class) then we are failing, too. We are failing to see women, men and children as spiritual beings. Sexuality may have something to do with our bodies and minds, but it has nothing whatsoever to do with our spirits. Our spirits will live forever, you see, either with God or apart from Him.
Abortion, I’m afraid, is a sinful choice that will continue for as long as we sinful people inhabit this earth. However, people who love the lives that God creates could remove many of the excuses for abortion if only we would stop telling our children: You are “sexual from birth.” It’s just not true.
Repeat a lie often enough and many will believe it. They will act upon it. But, I’d like to be one of the different people God calls followers of Jesus to be. The kind of people who resist being labeled by the world and who call other people by their rightful identity.
To do so will make a difference, one man, one woman, one child at a time.
Ezerwoman's Blog 
Marriage: It Is What It Is
Posted in Biblical manhood & womanhood, Commentaries of others, Culture Shifts, Faith & Practice, Relationships, tagged " homosexuality, agape love, Aristotle & marriage, children, civilization, Defense of Marriage Act, eros, family, gay marriage, Greek culture, homosexual marriage, husband and wife, Mercatornet, passion, Plato & marriage, Robert Reilly, sodomy, state, Supreme Court, truth on March 29, 2013| Leave a Comment »
Marriage is defined by the One who created it. That would be God.
Marriage is time-honored for a reason. It benefits men, women, children and civilization itself.
Marriage, reasoned the Greeks, was upheld for the good of the state.
Proponents of homosexuality often point to ancient Greece as a culture that embraced men with men and women with women. But Robert R. Reilly, writing for MercatorNet (3-11-13), has helped me understand that the great classical philosophers would have regarded such pairings as destructive for society. Socrates and Plato condemned homosexual acts as “unnatural.” The notion that someone was a “homosexual” for life — or found his identity in this behavior — would have struck them as quite odd. The practice of sodomy was accepted between an adult male and a young boy, but only temporarily because the youth was expected to get married and start a family as soon as he reached maturity.
Plato called the act of men with men “contrary to nature” and “due to unbridled lust.” Socrates loathed sodomy, noting that it is the practice of one enslaved to his passions rather than one who seeks the good of others. “The lesson,” writes Reilly, “is clear. Once Eros is released from the bonds of family . . . passions can possess the soul. Giving in to them is a form of madness because erotic desire is not directed toward any end that can satisfy it. It is insatiable.”
“That which causes evil in the soul,” said Plato, will ultimately result in political disorder. Plato understood the unbridled practice of sodomy to cause such evil and, thus, bring chaos to a nation built on order and logic.
It is for this reason that Greek philosophers spoke of the virtues of chastity and procreation within marriage. Aristotle described man and woman together in family without which the rest of society cannot exist.
Reilly explains, “Without family, there are no villages, which are associations of families, and without villages, there is no polis. ‘Every state is [primarily] composed of households,’ Aristotle asserts. In other words, without households – meaning husbands and wives together in families – there is no state. In this sense, the family is the pre-political institution. The state does not make marriage possible; marriage makes the state possible. Homosexual marriage would have struck Aristotle as an absurdity since you could not found a polity on its necessarily sterile relations. This is why the state has a legitimate interest in marriage, because, without it, it has no future.”
The Greeks understood the importance of marriage which is, as they saw it, the pairing of male and female as husband and wife. With that in mind, Reilly explains, “then chastity becomes the indispensable political principle because it is the virtue which regulates and makes possible the family – the cornerstone unit of the polis. Without the practice of this virtue, the family becomes inconceivable. Without it, the family disintegrates.”
“Homosexual” marriage, to Aristotle, would have been a self-contradiction. Perhaps that is why the word “homosexuality” did not exist in Greek, or any other language, until the late 19th century. Why would it? Truth dictates that “homosexual” is an oxymoron.
Jesus is Truth. He is also Love and Life. He instituted the agape love of marriage so that life might abound. He mourns the consequences of sinful choices. He does not rejoice in the pain that comes from confusion and slavery to selfish passion. But, He is faithful to the repentant who call upon His name.
Sin deceives. It distorts the meaning of love and alters relationships. But, the wisdom of Truth prevails.
The Greeks might not have acknowledged the source of truth, but they saw the wisdom of it.
Appreciation to Robert R. Reilly, MercatorNet, 3-11-2013
Read Full Post »