Labeling sex education “child abuse” is a strong statement. No one wants to be accused of abusing a child. I would not easily call someone a “child abuser.” All of us, however, are deceived by theories and techniques of the world. Education built on false teaching is sure to do harm.
If we blend false teaching or worldly ideas with God’s Word, we will most certainly compromise our best intentions. We will weaken the protective boundaries of God’s commands. It is never a good thing to tamper with things of God, especially the instructions He gives us about children.
God’s Word never tells us to educate children in sex. It tells us to instruct children in purity. To guard their innocence. To do nothing that might lead a child astray.
Here are some reasons why sex education – in or out of the church – is “child abuse.”
- “. . . [S]ex education is child abuse because it is ill-planned and poorly thought out, thus adding to the very problem it is trying to address and eroding the structure of a healthy family.” (Douglas Gresham, step-son of C.S. Lewis and founder of Rathvinden Ministries, a ministry to post-abortive and abused women in Dublin, Ireland, in an e-mail to ezerwoman.)
- Early, explicit, and boy/girl sex education classes can steal the innocence of children and create mind absorbing images, conflicts, and preoccupations. Boy/girl classes in sex education or “human sexuality” can be a form of desensitization that eventually strips away defenses and induces acceptance of alternative values.
- Sex education is taught in the “cool condition” of a classroom where children can say, “Yes, I’ll be smart,” but things change in “hot conditions.” Children may be informed in the classroom but, because their pre-frontal cortex is not fully developed, they possess neither the reasoning skills nor good judgment necessary to take command over feelings or peer pressure in the heat of the moment. (Dr. Miriam Grossman defines “cool” and “hot” conditions in her book, You’re Teaching My Child What?)
- Sex education removes the natural and protective covering of modesty. After their sin, God covered Adam and Eve’s embarrassment with far more than a bikini. He covered their shame with the promise of Christ’s Robe of Righteousness. Putting boys and girls together in a classroom for an intimate discussion of “human sexuality” makes children vulnerable by stripping away modesty and stirring up self-awareness and curiosity.
- A goal of sex education is to get young people “comfortable with their bodies” or their “sexuality,” therefore, it should come as no surprise when scantily-clad girls approach the Lord’s Table much to the discomfort of pastors offering the Sacrament (or other gentlemen present). Too many girls are no longer embarrassed but, indeed, “comfortable” with drawing attention to themselves at the mall, on the beach, socializing, or even in church. In what way does this help a boy or man maintain chaste thoughts? (A helpful resource is the Bible study Dressing for Life: Secrets of the Great Cover-up available from CPH Publishing.)
- Sex education is a utopian lie. Secular sex education is built on the foundation of evolution and a worldview that opposes the Biblical worldview. Instruction in purity is built on the Word of the Creator and Redeemer. Christian educators may want children to grow comfortable with the beauty of God’s creation; to recover the Garden experience, but we’re not in the Garden anymore. Sin changed our hearts and the way we look at one another. Jesus says, “Out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander” (Matthew 15:19). Do we better equip children to fight the battle with sexual immorality by telling them they are “sexual beings” – or immortal souls? Captive to their sensual nature – or able to “control [their] own body in holiness and honor” (1 Thessalonians 4:4)?
- Christian sex education, most specifically, tantalizes the child; in other words, it presents something desirable to the view, but continually keeps it out of reach. It gives children much information about sex and “sexuality,” but then tells them to wait for marriage until after college and an established career. Does this seem cruel?
- Sex education may tempt into idolatry or self-worship. It’s “my identity.” It’s “my need.” It’s “my right.”
- Sex education may, unintentionally, get adolescents “hooked,” but then leave them “unprotected.” (Hooked by Joe McIlhaney, M.D. & Freda McKissic Bush, M.D.; Unprotected by Miriam Grossman, M.D.)
- Sex education might change a child’s attitude toward God. No matter what our sin, God is always our Father; we are always His children in Christ. But, if a child is given all manner of sexual information before he or she can make wise use of it in its proper time, then might the child ask, “What kind of loving God would create me with all these sexual desires and then tell me not to fulfill them?” Have we set the child up for frustration and anger toward God? Might the child ask, “What does it matter what I do if I am assured of Jesus’ love and forgiveness?” Might a child re-define God according to his or her perspective of what is “right” or “wrong” depending upon the situation?
What words of hope are there for the Christian who has been deceived? Who may have trusted sex education as something helpful for children? If we have built on wrong foundation or passed on a half-truth or lie, there is hope! King David sinned against God and hurt other people. But, with broken and contrite heart, David acknowledged his sins to the Lord (Psalm 32:3-5). He received God’s free grace and forgiveness. Leaving sinful ways behind, we become a “vessel for honorable use” (2 Timothy 2:23).
In Christ, we are “vessels for honorable use.” Wow! This identity does indeed raise us above that of just a “sexual being.” Imagine the change in thought. Word. Behavior.
(Excerpted from Faithfulness: One Child at a Time,
a work nearing completion by Linda Bartlett.
A PDF file is available at Issues. Etc., or Titus 2 for Life.)
Leave a Reply