Two days have passed since my hometown newspaper ran a page one story of a young man’s “marriage” to another young man. If the headline, “Mr. & Mr,” didn’t capture people’s attention, the photos of the men kissing and signing their “marriage” license did.
Today, several members of my congregation made a request and a promise. If I would write a letter-to-the-editor, they would gladly sign it. As members of our community, we agree that every home, classroom and newspaper mentors children and encourages them in one direction… or another. As Christians, we agree that we are compelled on behalf of our neighbors (young or old) and for the benefit of society to speak whatever the Word of God speaks.
Pondering appropriate words, I’m aware that some of my neighbors will claim that it’s the personal right of those men to marry (especially in light of Iowa’s same sex “marriage” law) and that everyone should just leave them alone. But…
- Do we all have the right to do whatever we want?
- When does my perceived “right” place my neighbor in harm’s way?
- Does a newspaper have the right to print any photo or article that gets attention, even that of a curious child?
- When two people do whatever “feels right” to them and one or both contracts an STD or HIV, do I have the right to insist that my personal tax dollars not fund their medical bills?
My hometown newspaper chose to highlight the “marriage” of two young men, ages 19 and 21. What was the message of the lead-in paragraph: “There wasn’t any music. No flowers or photographer. But something else was there Wednesday that’s present at most weddings — the look in the couple’s eyes.” Why was the reporter at the “wedding”? Obviously, photos were taken, but for what purpose?
I am concerned for these two young men. I am concerned about their spiritual welfare. Are they (like so many young people today) confused about their “sexuality?” Were they enticed by momentary feelings, flattered by attention, or empowered by a trendy social experiment? Did the newspaper paint a bulls-eye on these young men? If either of the young men experience emotional stress or depression, will the newspaper and community offer themselves as care-givers? What happens if these men want to be fathers?
What lesson… what value… what hope for the future of families and children is being taught when behavior is celebrated that flies in the face of the Creator of man, woman, and marriage?
Jesus said,
Temptations to sin are sure to come, but woe to the one through whom they come! It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin” (Luke 17:1-2).









Marriage in the Classroom
Posted in Biblical manhood & womanhood, Citizenship, Commentaries of others, Culture Shifts, Faith & Practice, Relationships, tagged children, DOMA, education, family, instruction, marriage, parental role, truth on March 10, 2011| Leave a Comment »
Shortly after same-sex “marriage” was forced on Massachusetts by that state’s highest court, a few parents realized their children were being taught same-sex unions were normal, natural, and the moral equivalent of marriage between a man and a woman. These parents attempted to opt their children out of these public school lessons, but were ultimately unsuccessful in a court of law. Two federal courts in Massachusetts, including the appeals court just below the U.S. Supreme Court, determined that, because same-sex “marriage” was legally recognized in Massachusetts, parents no longer had the right to determine whether or what their children would be taught about these relationships. (Source: Tom Minnery, Focus on the Family)
Marriage is being attacked even as children are being taught that all choices are equal. Here’s the thing. Mentoring, teaching morality, and raising children is the job of parents, not schools. Chuck Colson writes, “If we want our children to know how to behave prudently, how to delay gratification for a higher goal, how to look to the needs of others before pandering to their own passions, then we’ll have to teach them in the context of family — best of all, of course, a loving, mom-and-dad family.”
If the courts decide that marriage is just a contract between any kind or number of consenting adults, what consequences will follow? Colson notes that “we will have, in effect, removed all restraints and social conventions surrounding not just sex and marriage but child rearing and training as well. If morality is anything we want it to be, if it serves only our passions and personal autonomy, we’re doomed as a culture.”
Homosexual activists are working feverishly to convince educators to normalize an unnatural behavior. But, moms, dads, and grandparents can speak with the conviction of God’s Word, science and age-old human experience.
It appears to be very dark out there, but darkness has never overcome the light. (John 1:4)
Read Full Post »