“All the people care about is the economy.”
“The people aren’t interested in ‘social issues’ like abortion, homosexuality or gay marriage.”
“There they go again,” reports MSNBC and others. “The ‘radical right’ is working abortion and marriage into the conversation.”
Rightly so. Social issues, as they are called, are moral issues. The legalized killing of preborn human children is a moral issue. Re-defining marriage is a moral issue. Teaching our children that homosexuality is just a choice on the “sexual menu” is a moral issue.
Everything has a moral component. The government has a moral obligation to protect “life and liberty,” to maintain a strong military, and to live within its means. It should encourage responsible, orderly behavior and a good work ethic. It should protect families from drug cartels, terrorists, and enemies from within and without.
Anyone running for office should have moral integrity. Moral character. Moral and ethical fiber. It’s not just my opinion, but God’s mandate that people who rule a nation should respect the life that He creates. Anyone who compromises on issues such as abortion, infanticide, embryonic stem cell research, assisted suicide, and euthanasia has lost (or never had) a moral compass.
Those who seek to experiment with marriage and family float rumors. They say that Americans don’t really care about same-sex “marriage.” They add: If someone is against gay “marriage,” then they must be against homosexuals. Not true. People who believe they are homosexual are persons, too. They are people loved by God. But, God is the Creator of marriage and, therefore, He alone defines it. God created marriage for one man and one woman because it’s the best environment for children, it connects children to their biological origins, and it brings two opposites — male and female — together to mentor boys and girls in the way God intends for them to go.
Moral integrity is practiced — or not practiced — on Wall Street and in every business. In education. In health care. In courts of law. In the military. In homes. And during election cycles.
My eyes have seen that men and women who defend the sanctity of human life generally have a moral compass not only in place but in operation. Leaders — in the home, community, church, and government — who value the life that God creates and redeems in Jesus Christ are imperfect leaders to be sure, but they are accountable to someone other than themselves. Their God determines right and wrong. Their neighbors matter. Their choices reflect hope for a new generation.








Bible Provides Narrative for Life
Posted in Citizenship, Commentaries of others, Culture Shifts, Faith & Practice, Life issues, Vocation, tagged Bible, choices, Colson Center for Christian Worldview, culture, dialogue, entertainment, family, God's Word, hope, Judeo-Christian, lifestyle, man, media, metanarrative, news industry, Prison Fellowship Ministries, reflection, religion, understanding, woman on June 30, 2011| Leave a Comment »
The Bible provided this metanarrative for Western civilization. Even nonbelievers were familiar with its stories and ways of structuring moral and social reality. But the media — the news industry — changed that. People in this industry generally disregard or blatantly defy the Judeo-Christian narrative. They believe it’s their job to shape our thinking. They are constantly raising questions that cause people to doubt Christianity or any cultural traditions grown out of Biblical thinking. Chuck Colson, founder of Prison Fellowship Ministries, writes, “The result is that many people accept the idea that we should be constantly reevaluating what we believe and understand about the world — including our religious beliefs — but news stories cannot replace a culture’s metanarrative, because, by its very nature, the news gives priority to the shocking and the new. It is a cycle of endless deconstruction.”
“The good news,” writes Colson, “is that Americans are recognizing that the ‘news’ is becoming a little more than vulgar entertainment, largely irrelevant to our lives.”
A good practice is to use the news for appropriate and limited purposes. Sommerville offers this suggestion: “We should balance our bloated appetite for news with a cultural diet rich in books, reflection, and discussion. And we should put the news through a mental metanarrative grid — asking ourselves if the ‘news’ being offered up reinforces our cultural story — and our views of Christianity — or tears it apart.” Colson agrees. “The news may make us dumb — but reading and discussing great books, especially the Bible, leads to the kinds of wisdom that brings real understanding.”
Appreciation to How Now Shall We Live Devotional
by Charles Colson, Tyndale House Publishers
Read Full Post »