Ready for a second opportunity? Here’s #2 from Ezer’s Handbook —
#2 — MENTOR CONFIDENCE IN THE CREATED ORDER
Then the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him” (Genesis 2:18).
Find Hope in the Order of God’s Creation. Woman was not created at the same time, in the same way, or for the same purpose as man (Genesis 2:7, 15-22). But many women perceive the role of “helper” (2:18) as being inferior or second-best. Encourage younger and older women in your circle of relationships to read John 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7-8. Who is “the Helper” of whom Jesus speaks? “Helper” in Greek is parakletos which means “comforter” or “advocate”. “Helper” might also mean “encourager” or “ally”. The question for women is: how will we choose to help or encourage? Submission is another troublesome word for us as women, but a biblical perspective helps bring understanding. God uses the order of His very nature—Father, Son and Holy Spirit—to bring hope to a sinful people. The Trinity is equal, but with different and definitive roles. Jesus Christ is God, yet He submitted Himself to the Father for the sake of our salvation. To bring order out of chaos, God uses the headship of husband and father in marriage and family for the benefit and well-being of children and society. God uses the submission of the Son, Jesus Christ, to save His Bride, the Church, and serve with humility. What begins to change when we understand “helper” and “submission” in light of God’s Word rather than our own opinion?
Trust the identity bestowed in Baptism. A woman’s identity is not dependent on a man’s love, her appearance or what she does. God does not define a woman as “sexual,” but as “holy”. In Baptism, a woman becomes a daughter of God in Jesus Christ. Yes, she is still a sinner, but now God sees her covered in Jesus’ robe of righteousness. From a biblical perspective, the word “holy” means “set apart by God”. “Holy” is the opposite of common. Something common can be used by anyone, but a holy woman is used by God for good and holy purpose. In light of her Baptism, how can a woman view herself? How does true identity affect our choices and behavior?
Believe That Male and Female Are More Than Sexual. Too often, we skip from Genesis 1:27 to Genesis 2:24. In doing so, we miss something very important about the complementary purpose and vocation of male and female. Before God brought Adam and Eve together as “one flesh” in His institution of marriage, He called man to be a steward of all that He had made, to remember God’s Word, and to choose life. God called woman to help man in the stewardship of all creation and help him remember God’s Word and choose life. Do men and women have to be married in order to serve God in these ways? Although it has become commonplace during the last 50 years for men and women to be identified as “sexual beings,” we are more than that to God. While it is true that God designed male and female in the faithfulness of marriage to procreate, it is just as true that unmarried men and women are “holy” in Christ Jesus and can work together as caretakers of God’s world and be people of His Word and advocates of human life. We are not defined by our sexuality—in this life or the next—but by our holiness. What do Jesus’ words about marriage in Matthew 22:30 tell us about our “sexual” identity? To help yourself and others better understand true identity as male and female, google The Failure of Sex Education in the Church: Mistaken Identity, Compromised Purity (publication release: May 2014 by Linda Bartlett). We can help others understand that no matter our age, health or circumstance in life, every male and female has unquestionable identity and purpose as “holy ones”.
Stand Guard Against the Enemy of Life. Satan despises God’s order of creation because he wants us to live in chaos. His one question, “Did God really say . . .,” was all it took for Eve to doubt God’s Word for her life (Genesis 3:1). In doubt, Eve loosened her grip on the Sword of Truth. Did she believe that she was the privileged recipient of some new knowledge that God was keeping from her? Do you see how quickly she not only spoke for God but inserted words God never spoke (compare Genesis 3:2-3 with 2:16-17)? Nothing has changed. Satan continues to stir up doubt by asking women the same question. “Did God really say . . .?” Like Eve, do we respond by speaking what God does not about sexuality, marriage, abortion, headship and women’s ordination? Do we try to establish our own standard of right and wrong? Challenge yourself to help younger women fear, love and trust God above all things. Help them to recognize what is counterfeit and of Satan by knowing Jesus Christ, the Word of Truth (John 1:1-5, 14).
What’s next? #3: Mentor Biblical Womanhood
Ezer’s Handbook is a resource developed by
Linda Bartlett and presented at Titus 2 Retreats







The Hopelessness of Separating Procreation from Sex
Posted in Biblical manhood & womanhood, Citizenship, Commentaries of others, Culture Shifts, Life issues, Relationships, tagged childless, extinction, family, future, humanity, Japan, love, marriage, procreation, relationships, sex, trends on October 28, 2013| 1 Comment »
Eric Metaxas from Breakpoint (10/28) brings something to Ezerwoman’s attention. Having been concerned about the separation of procreation from sex here in the American culture, I find the following worthy of our attention. Eric Metaxas writes:
Long-time BreakPoint listeners know about Japan’s catastrophically-low birthrates: by 2060, Japan’s population is projected to fall by a third, the same percentage killed by the Black Death in 14th-century Europe.
Japan’s demographic decline has spawned some creepy adaptations, such as lifelike talking dolls for elderly Japanese without grandchildren, or the borrowing of other people’s grandchildren for a day.
Attempts to encourage child-bearing through economic incentives have failed, as they have in other countries with low birth-rates. Younger Japanese aren’t interested in reproducing themselves.
And now, according to a recent article in the UK’s Guardian, they’re increasingly uninterested in sex, as well.
A 2011 survey found that 61 percent of unmarried men and 49 percent of unmarried women between 18 and 34 were not involved in any kind of relationship. Another survey found that a third of those under thirty had never dated.
As the Guardian puts it, “Japan’s under-40s won’t go forth and multiply out of duty, as postwar generations did.” Why? Part of the reason has to do with Japanese attitudes to women in the workforce. As one 32-year-old woman told the paper, “a woman’s chances of promotion in Japan stop dead as soon as she marries.” The assumption is that she’ll become pregnant and have to resign.
While that helps to explain why her generation isn’t having children or even getting married, it doesn’t explain the lack of interest in sex. And it certainly doesn’t explain why an increasing number of Japanese men aren’t interested in it either.
One 31-year-old man spoke for many of his peers when he said, “I find some of my female friends attractive but I’ve learned to live without sex. Emotional entanglements are too complicated . . . I can’t be bothered.”
“Can’t be bothered.” Or mendokusai in Japanese. (Didn’t think I could speak Japanese, did you? Well, I can’t.)
Most of the other possible factors the Guardian cites, including “the lack of a religious authority that ordains marriage and family,” are only partial explanations. Japan’s “precarious earthquake-prone ecology that engenders feelings of futility, and the high cost of living and raising children” don’t explain the increasing lack of interest in sex. But here’s something that does: it’s the lack of interest in having children. The assumption of the sexual revolution was that, having severed the link between sex and procreation, the result would be “better sex.”
Since the “urban pastimes” available to younger Japanese provide pleasure without the entanglements, sex can seem like a bad investment of time and energy. Mendokusai.
The Guardian calls Japan’s separation of love and sex “pragmatic.” But the evidence strongly suggests that there is nothing “pragmatic”—as in “dealing with things sensibly and realistically”—about that separation. We human beings simply aren’t wired that way.
In some important respects, the difference between Japan and us is one of degree, not kind. It remains to be seen if a generation of young Americans will one day replace “whatever” with “mendokusai.”
Read Full Post »